The ten-year evolution of urban policies of the 321 municipalities in Lazio and Rome its capital, tell us a lot about the alleged growth models of our region.
In recent years there has been a long journey between the alleged acts of urban governance in vogue with today's center-right, duly sedimented in the recent past, the choices of center-left government of Romano and Latium. A Bipolar brick path aimed at developing imploding from the territory
If land development for several decades saw the need to override the first houses and then to homes and services. Today the question that emerges from the people is a demand for "urban condition" and network connectivity for all inclusive 5 the chief town of the province of Lazio region and their local communities.
Conversely, in the interpretation of planning instruments approved and adopted by the network of the lazio no one has responded to this point and was not measured on the "need from below," What was expected to formally participatory processes and procedures and was crushed in succumbed to the prevalence of direct actions of the great land rents and the consequent disastrous relationship with the world of finance local and international.
policy deliberately strayed institutional basis that the references listed below:
the constitutional provisions: the Italian Constitution
considers essential public intervention
about land ownership in relation to the social function of property.
The goals to which you must follow the public administrator are the conse
achievement rational use or soil conservation, through its
utility, seeking equitable social relationships and not circumvented. Only
why building permits are granted subject to the rights of others and stated that
of a property that does not fulfill a social function
not be guaranteed.
The wording of the legal requirement: The
planning instruments adopted so far produced the circumvention of the right to housing, jobs, services and sustainable mobility, and conversion of ecological
territory.
The wording of the rules implementing technical
Acts approved so far, in fact conceal the legal and institutional links provided by law: the set of proposed plans clearly avoid the imposition of mandatory statutory limits and constraints on land ownership in the setting of on limitations to the size, according to the condizoni
objective and the real priorities of the resident population.
The wording social
NPRG the example of the City of Rome is the most obvious case of the urban crisis of major cities and highlights how its negative effects on the entire floor Regione.Nel places of urban paths seem (both in the technical comments and proposals in its rebuttal to the plan), in an abstract way for the realization of collective needs and fit only for certain large individual needs and social and economic pressure groups. Despite striking
intentions have plans that do not resolve as follows:
-not refer to the first objective of any urban policy: the need to 'balance between population growth and growth of settlements. There is no entry-
nesun statistical quantities eligible for the exemption procedures in the plans.
-We can not guarantee the 'degree of implementation of the overall system of Nprg, a lack of intentional acts, which produces the insolutezza which remains the system of mobility, by rail, the public transport network, in fact become more accentuated not compatible with existing settlements and new forms of urban and extra urban congestion.
remember that back in 2001 by the simulations of the technology department jurisdiction of the City of Rome, the plan forecasts led to the collapse of the city, be privatized, territory, soil mobility, services and common goods. (Of course, we're talking about an unpublished study). The model of reference was the PRG in Bologna in 1991. After 20 years that plan has not reached 15% of the public interest objectives set, the balance of 35% achievement of the objectives of a private nature.
These introductory notes to the planning policies and the relationship that we build, they inevitably have a relationship with the decade of the bipolarity of the brick and socio condizoni urban citizens and the forms of self-defense and the construction of spaces due to a democracy and real, are all conditions to be regained, for the purpose of defending the territory and the creation of a social planning needs for the democratic development of urban and suburban life. We can do much in general terms and do so in local terms, for a new relationship between the capital and its region. The areas of Lazio have their peculiarities, but they have a link with Rome, we must move from a passive relationship between the capital and the rest of the regional reality through a new leadership of the territories.
follow notes on the subject. A
lines planning policies and the concealment of the same in the technical documents;
b Ratio of urban policy and fiscal issues;
new models of regional development
c actions to reduce the damage of soil
actions legal recourse to acts unconstitutional
in urban and urban issues and sustainable new jobs. Demercificazione
of common goods.
Federation of the Left
0 comments:
Post a Comment